Page 41 of 45
Re: The Official CAPiTA Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:19 am
by Vanni
pow_hnd wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:14 pm
Spenser wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 8:05 pm
Is it just me, or is it hard to find an actual stance range for them? I'm also seeing specs that disagree between their website and others.
Yeah, Capita is not good at putting out their specs. I will say that their stance options/references also keep me from riding their decks. Like who the fuck is riding a 25/26” stance? Most of their decks 160+ have 23’+ as reference with max widths up to 25/26”
The few decks they have that I’d like to try just won’t get me my stance at reference, which is a bummer.
100% agree. I was able to size up with the Kazu, because the past couple of years of this board the 154 and 151 share the same stance options (the 151 and 154 have the stance option as the previous 151). Before the 151 had narrower insert packs, and the 154 had wider.
Re: The Official CAPiTA Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:46 am
by casjcade
What I noticed the last years, is that min/max stance can be based off centre on minidiscs 2x4 instead of what was usually 4x4 as standard, so min stance with a 4x4 can be 2 cm more than it says in specs.
Re: The Official CAPiTA Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:45 am
by Vanni
Vanni wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:19 am
pow_hnd wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:14 pm
Spenser wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 8:05 pm
Is it just me, or is it hard to find an actual stance range for them? I'm also seeing specs that disagree between their website and others.
Yeah, Capita is not good at putting out their specs. I will say that their stance options/references also keep me from riding their decks. Like who the fuck is riding a 25/26” stance? Most of their decks 160+ have 23’+ as reference with max widths up to 25/26”
The few decks they have that I’d like to try just won’t get me my stance at reference, which is a bummer.
100% agree. I was able to size up with the Kazu, because the past couple of years of this board the 154 and 151 share the same stance options (the 151 and 154 have the stance option as the previous 151). Before the 151 had narrower insert packs, and the 154 had wider.
(but I asked to Capita about the min and max stance for a couple of boards, and they replied me, so I was able to get the info)
Re: The Official CAPiTA Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:53 am
by Jean77
Vanni wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:45 am
Vanni wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:19 am
pow_hnd wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:14 pm
Yeah, Capita is not good at putting out their specs. I will say that their stance options/references also keep me from riding their decks. Like who the fuck is riding a 25/26” stance? Most of their decks 160+ have 23’+ as reference with max widths up to 25/26”
The few decks they have that I’d like to try just won’t get me my stance at reference, which is a bummer.
100% agree. I was able to size up with the Kazu, because the past couple of years of this board the 154 and 151 share the same stance options (the 151 and 154 have the stance option as the previous 151). Before the 151 had narrower insert packs, and the 154 had wider.
(but I asked to Capita about the min and max stance for a couple of boards, and they replied me, so I was able to get the info)
Care to share that info?
Re: The Official CAPiTA Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:57 am
by Vanni
I think I asked them the min and max stance for 156 BSOD, let me check...
Re: The Official CAPiTA Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 4:28 am
by Vanni
Jean77 wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:53 am
Vanni wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:45 am
Vanni wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2025 2:19 am
100% agree. I was able to size up with the Kazu, because the past couple of years of this board the 154 and 151 share the same stance options (the 151 and 154 have the stance option as the previous 151). Before the 151 had narrower insert packs, and the 154 had wider.
(but I asked to Capita about the min and max stance for a couple of boards, and they replied me, so I was able to get the info)
Care to share that info?
"The most narrow stance with a 4x4 disk is 46.0375 on the 156 BSOD"
Re: The Official CAPiTA Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 4:49 am
by casjcade
Vanni wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2025 4:28 am
Jean77 wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:53 am
Vanni wrote: Mon Jan 27, 2025 3:45 am
(but I asked to Capita about the min and max stance for a couple of boards, and they replied me, so I was able to get the info)
Care to share that info?
"The most narrow stance with a 4x4 disk is 46.0375 on the 156 BSOD"
From what I can tell, this is with an open channel 4x4 disc (under), mounted offset at the inner 2x4 inserts.
This would be 50 cm with a Burton/Now disc.
https://unionbindingcompany.com/product ... 7687153919
Re: The Official CAPiTA Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 6:56 am
by Oldhead
pow_hnd wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:14 pm
Spenser wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 8:05 pm
Is it just me, or is it hard to find an actual stance range for them? I'm also seeing specs that disagree between their website and others.
Yeah, Capita is not good at putting out their specs. I will say that their stance options/references also keep me from riding their decks. Like who the fuck is riding a 25/26” stance? Most of their decks 160+ have 23’+ as reference with max widths up to 25/26”
The few decks they have that I’d like to try just won’t get me my stance at reference, which is a bummer.
I don't think the designers are doing this for the 25" stance crowd, it gives you more options for stance locations. You can setup a 22" stance closer to the tail or nose.
Re: The Official CAPiTA Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 8:55 am
by casjcade
Hmm, I think BSOD went from 52 cm min stance in 2023 to 50 cm in 2024.
Re: The Official CAPiTA Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2025 6:16 am
by casjcade
Purple Lambo in action: