kimchi wrote: Thu Dec 14, 2023 3:15 pm
jota wrote: Thu Dec 14, 2023 2:44 pm
1/ independent brands or brands supported by large capital or that changed ownership, that were in the 90s and today exist: ONLY:
Burton
Lib tech & gnu (mervin)
Nitro
Nidecker
Ride
Santa cruz
Sims
Winterstick
This small list even overstates how many brands survived.
Santa Cruz is basically a cash grab by NHS distribution. Looking closely at the Decal 3 I have in my basement, that thing is crap. They’re not even distributed in the US this season.
Winterstick is basically a brand new company after Wescott revived the brand ~10 years ago. I think they were just a dead legacy brand up whose trademark got bought out, similar to the new Kemper.
And Sims spent 15 years in the wilderness getting sold next to discount youth baseball bats, and is now run out of Japan.
Of course,
@kimchi that's why I put brands with external capital or bought by other companies. You know the economic situation of many brands better than I do. But I was curious why list 1 is small, list 2 is very small and list 3 is huge?
Speculating I came to this simple but curious analysis: which may or may not be correct: the brands that only manufactured boards didn’t survive in the market:
List 3 are brands that only made boards. They disappeared.
List 2 are brands that make boards but supported by ski giants and currently Salomon, which also has outdoor products.
Those smaller brands who tried only with boards were left along the way... volk, elan...
List 1 is where the substance is: why have they survived? Sims, winterstick, santa cruz... they are where you say they are... nitro and ride I don't know... mervin with external capital behind...
And then there are the two big ones.
A/ The Great American o e: Burton
B/ the big European one: nidecker
Burton whose characteristic is that he offers everything. Clothes, backpacks, casual clothes, boards boots, bindings, waxes… everything
And Nidecker, who only makes boards, but surely his success is based on the brands they own or what he earns because other brands manufacture in his factory.
… and in the search for the most authentic or honest snowboard brand, to support it, perhaps this is the reality and we must understand that to survive, brands have to do more things than just sell boards, even if they are things that sometimes they must to do and we don’t like (Mervin making skis...)…
and perhaps that is the key to why there are so few authentic or honest brands that have survived on their own and why others need help or groups behind them to continue doing so,... it could be like this or maybe I just said nonsense