OUTERWEAR
Re: OUTERWEAR
Throwing it out there: I have a pair of Oyuki Goshiki Yamapro 3L bibs (https://oyuki.com/product/mens-goshiki- ... ib-pant-2/) in size M and in last season's slate blue colorway that I might sell. I actually quite like it (slight stretch, pocket configuration is pretty good) but it is just too large and baggy for me. Bought and used for less than a week in Niseko when my Arc bibs fell apart. Too lazy to list it, but if somebody from the EL community is interested, hit me up!
- Attachments
-
- EB-242248-1008_Oyuki_2024_Winter_Goshiki-YamaPro-3L-Bibs_Mens_Dark-Slate_PS-2023-06-19_Oyuki_On_Model_0073_2048x2048.jpg (58.41 KiB) Viewed 367 times
Re: OUTERWEAR
My pair of dojo's just showed up and while the fit is good, a couple of things bug me:coleslawed wrote: Sun Dec 08, 2024 11:30 am picked up the 686 Dojo Gore pants over black friday weekend (along with their waterproof Team Hoodie, more on that in the non-outerwear thread) to have a non-ski patrol looking kit (‘22 Longo Jacket in red-orange and the pants in white-black), and these are finally a pant that’s genuinely baggy on me. the Longo was close, but still show off my phone and keys in my pocket when I’m not running the jacket. still not the mega baggy the tiktok kids are running (i did witness some youngster in pants that had to have had 40” leg openings at Trollhaugen friday night), just a proper loose fit, which is hard to achieve with my tree trunks.
1) no pow skirt connector loops! The dojo jacket has a powskirt according to the website... I haven't tried just looping them into the belt loops yet. Hopefully that works.
2) give me a zipper please so I don't have to pull my pants down to pee like a 5 year old! If cost is a problem, get rid of the useless butt pocket zippers.
Japan//Dupraz D1 5'2,5'5 standard, 5'5+, 6+, D-Tour 5'5, B.Hot 56/Now Drive/Spark R&D Surge
- eleveneightnate
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2022 9:05 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: OUTERWEAR
Pretty sure Burton changed up their AK fits again, or at least the Cyclic. I've always been a large but this 24/25 large doesn't fit me at all. It's super slim from the waist down, to the point that when I'm at my normal stance width it restricts movement when leaning/squatting. Just ordered an XL to see if it fits better.
Side note: deep emerald is
Side note: deep emerald is
Re: OUTERWEAR
Great color, I'm thinking of picking up the Swash pants in same.
Re: OUTERWEAR
How old is your other AK stuff? It's been the same as far as I can tell for the last 4 or more years. There is a lot of variances allowed in manufacturing, I've seen larges with more than an inch difference in chest circumference before, and Burton doesn't make any accommodation for insulated pieces (IE they will feel smaller and snugger due to the insulation. North face, Patagonia and Arc'teryx insulated garments are often 1/2 to 1 inch bigger than shell versions.eleveneightnate wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:28 am Pretty sure Burton changed up their AK fits again, or at least the Cyclic. I've always been a large but this 24/25 large doesn't fit me at all. It's super slim from the waist down, to the point that when I'm at my normal stance width it restricts movement when leaning/squatting. Just ordered an XL to see if it fits better.
Side note: deep emerald is
IMG_6965 (1).JPEG
- eleveneightnate
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2022 9:05 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: OUTERWEAR
My other Cyclic is the Hedge Green one from '23, so definitely after their latest fit update. Also briefly had a '24 Cyclic in black that fit great as well, but this '25 is way slimmer than both. Maybe I just got a weird one.AyAyRon wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 1:16 pm How old is your other AK stuff? It's been the same as far as I can tell for the last 4 or more years. There is a lot of variances allowed in manufacturing, I've seen larges with more than an inch difference in chest circumference before, and Burton doesn't make any accommodation for insulated pieces (IE they will feel smaller and snugger due to the insulation. North face, Patagonia and Arc'teryx insulated garments are often 1/2 to 1 inch bigger than shell versions.
- coleslawed
- Reactions:
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2022 9:16 pm
- Location: midwest
- Contact:
Re: OUTERWEAR
similar complaints about the lack of a zipper, that was my biggest concern regarding fit in getting them over my hips, but there's plenty of room there. going #1 is already awkward for me as I'm in a Ninjasuit, too, so we'll deal with that.Supra wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2024 9:40 pmMy pair of dojo's just showed up and while the fit is good, a couple of things bug me:coleslawed wrote: Sun Dec 08, 2024 11:30 am picked up the 686 Dojo Gore pants over black friday weekend (along with their waterproof Team Hoodie, more on that in the non-outerwear thread) to have a non-ski patrol looking kit (‘22 Longo Jacket in red-orange and the pants in white-black), and these are finally a pant that’s genuinely baggy on me. the Longo was close, but still show off my phone and keys in my pocket when I’m not running the jacket. still not the mega baggy the tiktok kids are running (i did witness some youngster in pants that had to have had 40” leg openings at Trollhaugen friday night), just a proper loose fit, which is hard to achieve with my tree trunks.
1) no pow skirt connector loops! The dojo jacket has a powskirt according to the website... I haven't tried just looping them into the belt loops yet. Hopefully that works.
2) give me a zipper please so I don't have to pull my pants down to pee like a 5 year old! If cost is a problem, get rid of the useless butt pocket zippers.
first day on-hill with them was Sunday, and the outer leg openings don't sinch down quite enough to stay in place on my boots. other than that quite enjoying them so far.
Re: OUTERWEAR
We've went from tiny dickholes to no dickholes at all.
I got some new underoos recently, name brand, not even some gwintoo plutek qwee fashion amazon brand, and they don't have a dickhole.
I guess my genitalia is a social construct and I don't need one.
Pretty sure those mystery drone ufos are just here to try and figure out where the dickholes have gone and why folks aren't rioting in the streets about it.
I got some new underoos recently, name brand, not even some gwintoo plutek qwee fashion amazon brand, and they don't have a dickhole.
I guess my genitalia is a social construct and I don't need one.
Pretty sure those mystery drone ufos are just here to try and figure out where the dickholes have gone and why folks aren't rioting in the streets about it.
jadhevou
- eleveneightnate
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2022 9:05 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: OUTERWEAR
HahahaC.Fuzzy wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2024 2:59 pm We've went from tiny dickholes to no dickholes at all.
I got some new underoos recently, name brand, not even some gwintoo plutek qwee fashion amazon brand, and they don't have a dickhole.
I guess my genitalia is a social construct and I don't need one.
Pretty sure those mystery drone ufos are just here to try and figure out where the dickholes have gone and why folks aren't rioting in the streets about it.
Re: OUTERWEAR
I've had a variety of Burton tech boxers for years that have dickholes, but I tried some gwintoo plutek qwee tech boxer briefs from Amazon that have no dickholes, and I like it. I never use the hole, and now my HumanPenis™ doesn't sneak out anymore when I'm sleeping.
Last edited by Spenser on Tue Dec 17, 2024 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.