EzLounging

C.Fuzzy wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 9:38 am

Blessed420 wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 8:59 am

Some hitech stuff, can you get this on step ons???

Called bone because the only thing you're going to be doing in those is laying on the ground like a dick

Sure it's not called Re-Roll?

Jesus fucking christ.

I just gifted that guy three views on Instagram, to verify that those bindings, indeed, only work if you want to look like shit when you ride

HasanPoland wrote: Sat Jan 18, 2025 3:51 am Let’s do that

so it doesn't look like there is a way to switch the release lever to the inside of the binding? that sucks...

casjcade wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 11:15 am

C.Fuzzy wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 9:38 am

Blessed420 wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 8:59 am

Some hitech stuff, can you get this on step ons???

Called bone because the only thing you're going to be doing in those is laying on the ground like a dick

Sure it's not called Re-Roll?

@bonebreaker_binding

praying it’s not to move to the 32 Fases

coleslawed wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 5:58 pm praying it’s not to move to the 32 Fases

IMG_4768.png

he must of deleted it, it's a different story now.

might have meant that one for his close friends list

TGR's review of these things (I can't bring myself to revive the Step On thread):

I'll raise you a video from Fawcett, a slight ghtly more credible source:



This is why I can't take the "only for Jerries" argument too seriously. Mark Fawcett and Dave Downing preferentially ride Step Ons when they can ride whatever bindings they want. I wasn't too stoked on v1, kooks definitely gravitate towards them, but they got a place in a performance quiver pending rider preference.

And yea the occasional mid-mountain eject happens but over the years I've had catastrophic equipment failure on various brands of regular bindings. Shit happens.