It annoys me that I'm even posting this. I don't know why I bother to watch this guy, but angry's new review of the updated transition finder is hard to wrap my head around. He starts by saying it's been years since he's ridden one, and then goes on to make comparisons, listing the exact opposite of reality. It's softer in general, it's softer torsionally, it's less damp, it's less stabile, it doesn't carve as well, it's more loose… some of that could have to do with technique, but most of it is measurably incorrect. We know he's not a great rider, which is fine - until his ego comes in to play. But even when he does ride a board, you know he's not spending much time on them. And in some cases, like this, I don't think he even rode it. The truth is, to do the reviews he does, he doesn't need to. It's an easy formula.
The famous skateboard coffee crash (Garrett Hill) was recently debunked as fake, yet the dude has been milking it for years, and still won't admit it. Who cares, but that's funny. I'm waiting for the day when this happens to angry. Who wants to take a trip to Colorado?
Look at me, I'm a 36 y/o bum complaining about a YouTube reviewer because he's wrong about a board I like
