Page 56 of 58

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2025 2:39 pm
by TRIGGER
gringo68 wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 1:42 pm Everything about the direction B is such a shame. In my head they are the second most cringe brand behind NS. Would rather ride an Armada snowboard then current day B.
100%! Current Burton is garbage. The soul of the brand died with Jake. Everything is so watered down, and the graphics are SO boring.

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2025 9:28 pm
by eleddieo
https://www.boardertown.co.nz/brand/bur ... -280255785
If anyone else wants to geek out on board specs:)

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 1:15 pm
by jsil
TRIGGER wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 2:39 pm
gringo68 wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2025 1:42 pm Everything about the direction B is such a shame. In my head they are the second most cringe brand behind NS. Would rather ride an Armada snowboard then current day B.
100%! Current Burton is garbage. The soul of the brand died with Jake. Everything is so watered down, and the graphics are SO boring.
I thought that too until I got on a Gril Master. IMO it's a great board (and the first Burton I've owned).

I'm also a huge fan of all the work that they put into StepOn because it's pushing everyone else to make big changes in their bindings. It's possible that FASE and Supermatic would be a thing without StepOn, but likely they were developed because of competition.

Competition is good.

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 1:18 pm
by benjinyc
how many of you are mourning that Burton killed off Flying V for next season

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 1:33 pm
by Paidingum
benjinyc wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 1:18 pm how many of you are mourning that Burton killed off Flying V for next season
Flying V was ass.

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 5:22 pm
by bboytommy
I'm frankly shocked how long flying v stuck around for.

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 7:53 pm
by AyAyRon
Are you shocked that Libtech still offers it?

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 7:56 pm
by Spenser
IMO although same concept, I think C2 is done better. Seems less aggressive/wonky, and typically doesn't have early rise in addition to the main profile. I'm not a fan of any rocker profile, but just sayin'

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 9:11 pm
by jsil
Spenser wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 7:56 pm IMO although same concept, I think C2 is done better. Seems less aggressive, and typically doesn't have early rise in addition to the main profile. I'm not a fan of any rocker profile, but just sayin'
Agree with that.. C2 is definitely better and I'm also not a huge fan of any rocker profile. Flying V is just awful.

I did enjoy the Neversummer Swift though. I'd like to get on one again now that I'm a much stronger rider and see if I would still like it.

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:30 pm
by AyAyRon
I don't mind flying V at all. Makes riding a twin super fun in the powder, I don't notice that much of a downside in any conditions other than super hard packed. I think cambered twins with early rise is the best overall do anything bend though.