Page 34 of 120
Re: Hardgoods 24/25
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 1:42 am
by MarkusM
coleslawed wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:05 pm
MarkusM wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 6:14 am
anyone know if the regular taka is still in salomons lineup?
its a beauty and i might get a spare or 2. =P
pretty sure the far left in photo 3 here is the regular Taka,
LINK
as well as the middle one in photo two here
LINK
new look, though, so I'd stock up on this year's if you want the bamboo topsheet.
the middle one in photo two on instagram is sick stick the far left in photo 3 on snowboard mag is the taka. =)
i can live with the new look for sure.
EDIT: looking at the techbook it seems like the only change in construction is recyceled ABS sidewalls instead of cork/bamboo.
Re: Hardgoods 24/25
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 6:38 am
by eleveneightnate
G.D. wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2024 8:47 pm
Yep, my fave one! Liking it enough that I asked a friend about it who's buddies with a Salomon rep. Apparently it's medium flex, and he knows how I ride and said it may be too soft for me. But I really like the shape and look, plus I'm not opposed to medium flex these days as long as the specs line up close to my ideal. Plus, someone here had/has one and had nothing but great feedback about it, iirc?
And yeah, cheers @Supra. Hope all is well there in Japan!
For sure! I cross-shopped it with my Super 8 this season. Apparently it's a lot softer than Salomon claims. Like a freeride shape with a park flex. I dunno, it sounds fun to me and Bode rides some version of it (probably stiffer than stock, but still). The graphics reminds me of Starfield, totally nerding out over it.

- SMALL_Hope_Martin.jpg (1.25 MiB) Viewed 2317 times
Re: Hardgoods 24/25
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:35 am
by C.Fuzzy
Hellsyeah. Dustin Craven got a pro... is this his first?
The Now/Yes Binderings look noice
The 3D Fish looks sex
Lib is entirely hit or miss with me. Mmmostly miss me with that...
Re: Hardgoods 24/25
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:57 am
by Vanni
C.Fuzzy wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:35 am
The Now/Yes Binderings look noice
I didn't recognize the binding models.
Are there still all mountain/freeride bindings in the Yes line?
The first one seems to have a carbon highback, though, so they should be the "Drive Cx" replacement
Re: Hardgoods 24/25
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:02 am
by C.Fuzzy
Sims could be well positioned to take advantage of the 90's revival and be cool again. Wouldn't that be something.
Re: Hardgoods 24/25
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:09 am
by C.Fuzzy

- yiss.jpg (124.69 KiB) Viewed 2262 times
Vanni wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:57 am
C.Fuzzy wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:35 am
The Now/Yes Binderings look noice
I didn't recognize the binding models.
Are there still all mountain/freeride bindings in the Yes line?
The first one seems to have a carbon highback, though, so they should be the "Drive Cx" replacement
I'm doubtful this is their entire lineup, but maybe just the new new. Canted footbeds on most of those too. Hopefully the swappable options too. Need moar pics.
Re: Hardgoods 24/25
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:46 am
by eleveneightnate
Select Pro highbacks on the four to the right. Me likey.
Re: Hardgoods 24/25
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 10:33 am
by kimchi
I might grab the Drive Pros while I can. Don't see it in that line-up, and the new highback looked really interesting when I played around with them.
Re: Hardgoods 24/25
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 1:10 pm
by Snowdaddy
Next years Sickstick looks very nice...
Re: Hardgoods 24/25
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 4:20 pm
by jota
C.Fuzzy wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:09 am
yiss.jpg
Vanni wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:57 am
C.Fuzzy wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:35 am
The Now/Yes Binderings look noice
I didn't recognize the binding models.
Are there still all mountain/freeride bindings in the Yes line?
The first one seems to have a carbon highback, though, so they should be the "Drive Cx" replacement
I'm doubtful this is their entire lineup, but maybe just the new new. Canted footbeds on most of those too. Hopefully the swappable options too. Need moar pics.
This AIR logo…
any hidden intention against B?