The Official Korua Shapes Thread

Gear for playing snowboards with your friends. Snowboards, outerwear, bindings, boots, stomp pads, mankinis, etc.
User avatar
ad1105
Reactions:
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:34 pm

Re: The Official Korua Shapes Thread

Post by ad1105 »

Well, as misleading as Korua’s titanium claims may be, the tech works. I couldn’t care less about what they call it. 🤙🏼
a bit of taper, a lot of camber
casjcade
Reactions:
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:00 am

Re: The Official Korua Shapes Thread

Post by casjcade »

yeah noticed they used titanium in the product details.. who knows? its snowboard tech. like put some graphene particles in the base, and you have a DIAMOND INFUSED SINTERED ULTRA OVER 9000+ base. And retail reviewers eat it raw and drool over all that new tech. People trying to explain it is one of the few reasons to watch reviews, its fun how it can spiral out of control.
Wes Bourne
Reactions:
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:21 pm

Re: The Official Korua Shapes Thread

Post by Wes Bourne »

So I step away from playing snowboards for a few years bc of health issues and you guys moved... Again???

Anyway, I finally caved and took a sip of the Kool Aid.
thumbnail_IMG_1185.jpg
thumbnail_IMG_1185.jpg (163.73 KiB) Viewed 1755 times
Gotta admit the ref stance location has me confused:
thumbnail_IMG_1185-1.jpg
thumbnail_IMG_1185-1.jpg (159.34 KiB) Viewed 1755 times
Are the insert packs centered over the sidecut? If so, the ref stance (54cm/21.25'') is forward w/r of the sidecut??? Or is the ref stance centered on the sidecut (as I expect it to be) and the insert packs set back of that? I've always been used to seeing insert packs evenly spaced on either side of reference.

I even took out my measuring tape to make sure it wasn't because the insert packs were drilled too close or too far apart... (That checked out ok, I get the correct 48-60cm stance range.)
Dave T
Reactions:
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 6:28 am

Re: The Official Korua Shapes Thread

Post by Dave T »

Pretty sure my otto 61 is the same. To get the ref stance I was one set forward on the front foot and the "normal" ref stance position in the back. The alternatives did not look or feel right.
Wes Bourne
Reactions:
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:21 pm

Re: The Official Korua Shapes Thread

Post by Wes Bourne »

Dave T wrote: Thu Feb 09, 2023 6:32 pm Pretty sure my otto 61 is the same. To get the ref stance I was one set forward on the front foot and the "normal" ref stance position in the back. The alternatives did not look or feel right.
I reached out to Korua and this was their reply:

'…boards come with 89° lateral and 0,5 bevel baseside.

Regarding recommended stance we propose to use the insert the cross is pointing to, the second and 4th from each pack. Thats the position with the announced setback.

But you can play. If you want more float, edgehold and stability move towards tail. If you want more agility move towards nose.'


I assume that means setback in relation to the sidecut, which now makes sense bc moving the ref stance forward to the top inserts (i.e. + 20mm) would then be centered on sidecut and as far forward as you could go on the board.

I hadn't thought of that because aside from a Fishcuit, all my boards were either true twins or directional twins (ref stance centered over sidecut with a longer nose than tail).
User avatar
pow_hnd
Site Admin
Reactions:
Posts: 719
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:03 pm
Location: SLC

Re: The Official Korua Shapes Thread

Post by pow_hnd »

Wes Bourne wrote: Wed Feb 08, 2023 6:49 pm So I step away from playing snowboards for a few years bc of health issues and you guys moved... Again???

Anyway, I finally caved and took a sip of the Kool Aid.

thumbnail_IMG_1185.jpg

Gotta admit the ref stance location has me confused:

thumbnail_IMG_1185-1.jpg

Are the insert packs centered over the sidecut? If so, the ref stance (54cm/21.25'') is forward w/r of the sidecut??? Or is the ref stance centered on the sidecut (as I expect it to be) and the insert packs set back of that? I've always been used to seeing insert packs evenly spaced on either side of reference.

I even took out my measuring tape to make sure it wasn't because the insert packs were drilled too close or too far apart... (That checked out ok, I get the correct 48-60cm stance range.)
Mount it reference and rip it!
SLC, UT - Cardiff Snowcraft - NOW - Spark R & D - AK457 - DC - Anon - Milosport -




pow_hnd - Insta
pow_hnd - YouTube
casjcade
Reactions:
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:00 am

Re: The Official Korua Shapes Thread

Post by casjcade »

Got the bindings on my Noserider almost centered now, and I love that thing for riding heavy crusty snow. The stable planky nose is like an icebreaker on edge, and I just sit back and cruise, while some other boards flail around. It’s not what I bought it for, but that’s my goto use for it now.
spanyard
Reactions:
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2022 12:47 am
Location: Mudwest
Contact:

Re: The Official Korua Shapes Thread

Post by spanyard »

Today was a good day.
Attachments
20230228_113809.jpg
20230228_113809.jpg (1.79 MiB) Viewed 1356 times
User avatar
pow_hnd
Site Admin
Reactions:
Posts: 719
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:03 pm
Location: SLC

Re: The Official Korua Shapes Thread

Post by pow_hnd »

Have settled in on these four as my 95% of the time quiver...
  • OG TF 57
  • Pin Tonic 64
  • Otto 61
  • OG TF 57 Split
Attachments
IMG_5657.JPG
IMG_5657.JPG (3.25 MiB) Viewed 1280 times
SLC, UT - Cardiff Snowcraft - NOW - Spark R & D - AK457 - DC - Anon - Milosport -




pow_hnd - Insta
pow_hnd - YouTube
casjcade
Reactions:
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:00 am

Re: The Official Korua Shapes Thread

Post by casjcade »

Noticed they changed the shape of the Noserider. The first one had a nose similar to the Uberegg, the new Noserider looks narrower and rounder in the front, and more effective edge, and some notches in the channel.
Post Reply