The Official Burton Thread

Gear for playing snowboards with your friends. Snowboards, outerwear, bindings, boots, stomp pads, mankinis, etc.

Moderators: C.Fuzzy, C.Fuzzy

michaelangelo
Reactions:
Posts: 755
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2022 3:04 pm

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Post by michaelangelo »

I posted the available specs somewhere.. in some thread .. I think
User avatar
ad1105
Reactions:
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2022 1:34 pm

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Post by ad1105 »

bboytommy wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 4:22 pm
ad1105 wrote: Wed Jan 15, 2025 4:07 pm I have no idea on specs, sorry. I was hoping to ride the 163 but the 158 felt pretty great. I was riding with 9.5 Vans Verses and didn’t sketch out while carving at speed. It’s what I was hoping for in the Showstopper from a couple seasons back.
all good! appreciate you spreading the hype and sharing your POV
Cheers dude. That’s about as much as I could say with only five runs on it. I’ve asked our B rep if I can ride it in our local banked slalom in March. I’m sure there will be more thoughts about it as ‘26 gear demos keep rolling.
a bit of taper, a lot of camber
User avatar
coleslawed
Reactions:
Posts: 1134
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2022 9:16 pm
Location: midwest
Contact:

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Post by coleslawed »

i didn’t hop on that one yesterday, but everyone who did raved about it.
midwest is best

alchemy.is
michaelangelo
Reactions:
Posts: 755
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2022 3:04 pm

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Post by michaelangelo »

BEND: Camber
SHAPE/FLEX: Directional, 18mm Taper, Directional
CORE: Super Fly II™ 700G Core with Dualzone™ EGD™, Squeezebox
FIBERGLASS/BASE: 45° Carbon Highlights, Sintered WFO
EXTRAS: Infinite Ride, The Channel®, Pro-Tip, Super Sap® Epoxy
Personality: 6-9 (Medium - Aggressive)
TERRAIN: Park: 5/10, All-Mountain: 10/10, Powder: 7/10
User avatar
Shredder
Reactions:
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2022 10:19 pm
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Post by Shredder »

Sounds like a fun one. Did you get a look at the smooth operator?
Directional pow shapes, camber, Now Drive/pilot 80kg, 175cm
solberg
Reactions:
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2022 6:37 am

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Post by solberg »

I have a question about the distance between the channels! Not sure about this since on the B website they only list the reference stance, but this doesn't necessarily means the channel is still at the same place (regarding different board lengths).

Yesterday I demoed the HTH160 and with large EST bindings stance options are somewhat limited when placing the binding more centered (to effective edge/running length/contact points) because the binding itself is pretty wide. I'm curious if the channels are in the same distance in the next length (165)? Running length ist +5cm so it's not the case that nose and tail are just longer. But reference stance remains the same. Just wondering in the channel also moves...
casjcade
Reactions:
Posts: 580
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:00 am

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Post by casjcade »

Ref placement on channel seems to move slightly towards the center on smaller ref stances, but maybe it's just changed over the years. Would think ref has the same nose/tail ratio at least.

You want to know if the min/max stance changes with the bigger board, and it's just the ref that stays the same?
AyAyRon
Reactions:
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2023 8:57 pm

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Post by AyAyRon »

solberg wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 2:28 am I have a question about the distance between the channels! Not sure about this since on the B website they only list the reference stance, but this doesn't necessarily means the channel is still at the same place (regarding different board lengths).

Yesterday I demoed the HTH160 and with large EST bindings stance options are somewhat limited when placing the binding more centered (to effective edge/running length/contact points) because the binding itself is pretty wide. I'm curious if the channels are in the same distance in the next length (165)? Running length ist +5cm so it's not the case that nose and tail are just longer. But reference stance remains the same. Just wondering in the channel also moves...
I can answer this for you in the next day or two
AyAyRon
Reactions:
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2023 8:57 pm

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Post by AyAyRon »

solberg wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 2:28 am I have a question about the distance between the channels! Not sure about this since on the B website they only list the reference stance, but this doesn't necessarily means the channel is still at the same place (regarding different board lengths).

Yesterday I demoed the HTH160 and with large EST bindings stance options are somewhat limited when placing the binding more centered (to effective edge/running length/contact points) because the binding itself is pretty wide. I'm curious if the channels are in the same distance in the next length (165)? Running length ist +5cm so it's not the case that nose and tail are just longer. But reference stance remains the same. Just wondering in the channel also moves...
I just checked on a HTH 160 vs a 165W (not the same years though, but i don't think there are any changes) and the channels are located the same amount apart form each other (approx 12 inches). Its the same for a 162 custom vs a 166W custom (only one year apart), if you place them side by side on the floor the channels and ref stances line up. I guess the way to think of it is the difference in lengths are at the ends of the boards not so much between the feet, if that makes sense.
casjcade
Reactions:
Posts: 580
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:00 am

Re: The Official Burton Thread

Post by casjcade »

Is 25/26 the 30y Custom, or is it 26/27?
Post Reply