EzLounging

Hey I still ride my Supernatant. I always liked their stuff, wonder where the boards are being made? Feel like they can't still be at Mothership. Binding is either a strong sign of the future, or it's a parts garbage chimera and will be terrible. I myself am hoping for the former.

I just looked at that DC catalog, are they not getting out of snow now? They have a binding? Is this an asian market specific thing?

Corey is a "I'm more core than you" blowhard anyway.

I bet if you ask Flowers, that is the MOST ACCESSIBLE pow board period.

Red using the low end Arbor binding. And what looks like Union ankle straps.

J0_Zehp wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:00 am Who know where are made the boards from the Nidecker group ?

I think at this point either Titan or SWS

it's pretty basic. A twin is identical. If the deck is not identical with a fully centered stance, then it's directional. For a long time though, any deck with the word Twin in its description sold better to the masses.

Companies can learn to do better messaging on decks with minimal taper ...

coleslawed wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 2:45 pm those Cinelli bikes are so incredibly niche

I'm hyped. To me a very random team up, but I've been a Cinelli fan since my hipster fixed gear days in LA

This 100%.

I have 3 solid decks. A what some people call "Directional Twin" ( no such thing exists, its a marketing term )


Pushing back on this. Directional twin, two variants. Twin shape, directional flex. Directional shape, nose and tail same stiffness i.e. twin flex. Full directional ...

Don't have a strong opinion on FASE/Step-ON/Supramatic, but I personally also do not care about the channel at all. I did have an old Capita Totally Awesome that had it, it was fine, but I never changed the stance after the initial set up. The whole notion of adjusting the stance for powder ...